Guide to Florida Eminent Domain Law
Eminent Domain Process- Your Property Rights
- Challenging the Government
- Eminent Domain Definitions
- Getting Full Compensation
- Hiring an Eminent Domain Attorney
Previous Posts
- This blog has moved
- The Real Lesson You Should Take from Sonia Sotomay...
- Eminent Domain and the Florida Constitution
- Exploring the Dissent in Walton County v. Stop the...
- Eminent Domain for Sewer and Water Projects
- Eminent Domain for Conservation
- Business Damages and Eminent Domain
- The Difference between Condemnation and Inverse Co...
- Supreme Court Takes Up Destin Beach Conflict
- When Is Your Florida Property Value Determined for...
Archives
- March 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
Florida Eminent Domain Blog | Gregory W. Stoner
The Florida Eminent Domain Law Firm, PA
*Required Fields Privacy Policy
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Prejudgment Interest for Florida Eminent Domain Compensation
According to Florida law, part of full compensation for your property taken through eminent domain is "prejudgment interest." This interest is applied to the difference between what was offered to you by the government as its "good faith" offer of compensation and the value of your property (or partial property, including severance damages) as determined by trial for the time period between when your property was taken and the final trial date (after all appeals, if any). (For more explanation, see The Condemnation Process.) But what is actually included in this prejudgment interest?
The Florida Supreme Court decided this question (which it considered to be "of great public importance") in Boulis v. Florida Department of Transportation. According to the Court, the question hinges on the language that "full compensation is determined 'by reference to the state of affairs that would have existed absent any condemnation proceeding whatsoever'" and by the statutory requirement that interest is applicable to all expenses incurred as a result of the eminent domain proceedings. This means that interest applies not only to the full difference between the condemning authority's "good faith" offer and the trial decision, but also to any "reasonable" expenses incurred by the property owner during the proceedings.
However, it is important to note two caveats. First, the court has the right to determine what constitutes "reasonable" expenses. In the precedent case, Boulis was billed by an expert he employed for $35,308, but the court determined that only $16,200 of that was considered "reasonable." So Boulis was responsible for nearly $20,000 out of pocket, a reminder that it is good to know what constitutes "reasonable" fees in the eyes of the court. Second, the court said that interest would only apply from the date that the expense was incurred, not from the date the condemning authority took title, unlike the rest of your full compensation.
At the Florida Property Rights Law Firm, P.A., we have experience with experts in numerous disciplines and can help you avoid getting stuck with out of pocket expenses for unreasonable experts' fees. We also remind you that normally our fees are paid for by the condemning authority and do not reduce your payment in any way.
To learn more about eminent domain and how we can help you, please schedule an eminent domain consultation today.
The Florida Supreme Court decided this question (which it considered to be "of great public importance") in Boulis v. Florida Department of Transportation. According to the Court, the question hinges on the language that "full compensation is determined 'by reference to the state of affairs that would have existed absent any condemnation proceeding whatsoever'" and by the statutory requirement that interest is applicable to all expenses incurred as a result of the eminent domain proceedings. This means that interest applies not only to the full difference between the condemning authority's "good faith" offer and the trial decision, but also to any "reasonable" expenses incurred by the property owner during the proceedings.
However, it is important to note two caveats. First, the court has the right to determine what constitutes "reasonable" expenses. In the precedent case, Boulis was billed by an expert he employed for $35,308, but the court determined that only $16,200 of that was considered "reasonable." So Boulis was responsible for nearly $20,000 out of pocket, a reminder that it is good to know what constitutes "reasonable" fees in the eyes of the court. Second, the court said that interest would only apply from the date that the expense was incurred, not from the date the condemning authority took title, unlike the rest of your full compensation.
At the Florida Property Rights Law Firm, P.A., we have experience with experts in numerous disciplines and can help you avoid getting stuck with out of pocket expenses for unreasonable experts' fees. We also remind you that normally our fees are paid for by the condemning authority and do not reduce your payment in any way.
To learn more about eminent domain and how we can help you, please schedule an eminent domain consultation today.
posted by Erica at 2:38 PM
0 comments
